162.295, 2011), and tampering with a witness (18 U.S.C. Impeachment is the art of attacking a testifying witness's credibility or truthfulness at trial. Perjury is committed when a witness lies while under oath in a court hearing. As for timing, there are no are hard and fast rules. You will also establish that everything the witness says should be called into question. Bonds was also charged with three counts of perjury, but the jury could not agree to convict, resulting in a mistrial on all three counts (Ortiz, J. L., 2011). Penal Code 92, accessed May 6, 2011, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/92.html. The House of Representatives later impeached Clinton for perjury and obstruction of justice, based on the statements he made at the grand jury investigation and his conduct during the Jones deposition. Ann. Tex. The jury instruction can be effective way to frame the impeachments significance. She knows the case will generate significant publicity, so Susannah shaves ten years off of her age when asked routine background questions by the prosecutor. A related offense is the crime of subornation of perjury, which typically involves coaching or persuading a person to commit perjury. Thus the harm element of subornation of perjury is lacking, and Marcus can be prosecuted only for attempted subornation of perjury or solicitation to commit perjury, rather than the completed offense. The cons: When youve ended with an impeachment, the redirect examiner will most likely follow-up with an explanation or clarification of the previous testimony, which may minimize the impact. And if the opportunity arises during cross, again, do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and how material? However, it would not be perjury if your witness statement was about what you have heard and not seen. admissible non hearsay. While the defense attorney was attempting to impeach the witness, I realized that he was nitpicking certain facts that were not in dispute. If the witness denies the statement, you impeach. Juries depend on witness testimony to reach a fair and impartial verdict in civil and criminal trials, and grand juries depend on witness testimony to indict defendants for criminal conduct. Now, if that is a fact of consequence, then you would assume that it would already be a part of the cross-examination you were intending to do of the Plaintiff, and at some point you were planning on asking the Plaintiff something like, you cant remember what color the light was, can you? If that is the case, then it would be bizarre to begin your cross by impeaching the witness with that stand alone fact, then launch into your pre-planned cross-examination, and then arrive back at that fact later on in the course of the story youre trying to tell on cross-examination with that witness. (1) in the course of one or more official proceedings the person makes two or more sworn statements which are irreconcilably inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false; (2) the . On May 6, 1994, Paula Jones filed a civil lawsuit for sexual harassment against then-president Bill Clinton. The O.J. . This would be considered sufficient proof of perjury, even without knowing which statement is actually false. Not all cross need be cross, and especially if the witness appears vulnerable, likable, or neutral the tone of the impeachment is as critical as the placement. 5A-11, et seq., 2011), resisting arrest (18 Pa. Cons. 1. In every trial attorneys arsenal of weapons, the impeachment by prior inconsistent statement is one of the most powerful. inconsistent statements comply with the language of the rule, then . Bribery is typically graded as a felony (N.Y. If you know of the opportunity in advance of trial, and nothing during the witness direct alters your cross examination plan, stay the course and keep in place otherwise, adapt accordingly. By Deborah C. England Defend your rights. A prior statement may be "inconsistent" without being directly contradictory, moreover. I agree with my colleague, Professor Lippy, that another smooth, logical place to place an impeachment by prior inconsistency is within the chapter covering that particular topic. The Model Penal Code has a similar provision (Model Penal Code 241.1(4)). He viewed it as capable of serving two ends: proving untruths and completing the story by eliciting facts that remained suppressed or undeveloped on direct examination, including the remaining and qualifying circumstances of the subject of testimony, as known to the witness., Precisely because of the presence of dual objectives, timing is everything. Said differently, assume a witness has information useful to the cross-examiner but also made an averment during direct examination that must be impeached with a clearly contradictory prior inconsistent statement. Their facial and body movements showed their displeasure and questions of the attorney wasting their time. For example:! Penal Code 86, http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/86.html. (1) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding that the person has been rehabilitated, and the person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than one year; or Isabel thereafter buys an expensive watch, has it wrapped, walks up to the judge, and offers it to him as a gift. Since you have not established your ability to control the witness, you might end up with a muddled impeachment and no chance to lock-in your concessions. Nonetheless, the threat of a felony conviction still serves as a deterrent and helps to ensure that witnesses testify truthfully in judicial and official proceedings and give accurate statements in certified writings. Marcuss admission that he was lying is not a retraction that could serve as a defense because it was not made until the lie was about to be exposed. If you plan to ask the jury to discount the entirety of the witnesss testimony, begin with the impeachment and systematically dissect and destroy his or her credibility throughout the rest of the cross-examination. Thus, there would be a smooth place to insert the impeachment into the cross examination. 13-2807, 2011). If the opportunity arises while the witness is on direct, do your math, and lest you have an idea for a stronger placement, consider using it to begin your cross, and then transition into what you had intended all along, circling back for emphasis, as appropriate. That being said, I may delay impeaching a witness when there is helpful or affirmative information to be gained during cross-examination. Lying under oath is punishable under the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines as the crime of Perjury. Nonhearsay examples in detail: (i) Prior Statements by Witness:-Prior statement is is inconsistent with declarant's in-court testimony and was given under penalty of perjury at a prior proceeding; And as to materiality, just how important is the point that we intend? 613(b) differs from F.R.E. Example of a Preparatory Crime and Attempt, Voluntary Abandonment as a Defense to Attempt, Example of Voluntary Abandonment as a Defense to Attempt, Example of Attempt and Transferred Intent, Example of a Case Where Whartons Rule Is Inapplicable, LAW AND ETHICS : THE HAN MURDER CONSPIRACY, Renunciation as a Defense to Solicitation, Example of Intent to Cause Serious Bodily Injury, Good News: The US Murder Rate Is Declining, Factors Classifying Murder as First Degree, Definition of Willful, Deliberate, and Premeditated, Example of a Willful, Deliberate, Premeditated Murder, Example of Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Exception to Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Example of the Exception to Co-Felon Liability for Felony Murder, Liability When Someone Other than the Defendant Kills the Victim, Concurrence of the Felony and the Death of the Victim, Example of a Death That Occurs before the Felony Begins, Concurrence of the Killing and the Heat of Passion, Reckless or Negligent Involuntary Manslaughter, Example of Reckless or Negligent Involuntary Manslaughter, Sex Offenses and Crimes Involving Force, Fear, and Physical Restraint, Synopsis of the History of Rape and Sodomy, Proving Lack of Consent as an Attendant Circumstance, Proving Involuntary Consent by the Victims Resistance, The Requirement of Corroborative Evidence, Example of the Effect of a Rape Shield Law, Justification and Excuse Defenses to Battery, Attempted Battery and Threatened Battery Assault, Example of Attempted Battery Assault Act, Example of Attempted Battery Assault Intent, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Act, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Intent, Example of Threatened Battery Assault Harm, Domestic Violence Statutes Characteristics, Example of a Case Lacking Kidnapping Attendant Circumstance, Example of Kidnapping Attendant Circumstance, Potential Defenses to Kidnapping and False Imprisonment, Answers to You Be the Law Enforcement Officer, Example of a Case Lacking Consolidated Theft Intent, Larceny or False Pretenses Intent as to the False Statement of Fact, Example of Larceny or False Pretenses Intent as to the False Representation of Fact, Consolidated Theft Attendant Circumstance of Victim Ownership, Example of Mistake of Fact as a Defense to Consolidated Theft, Consolidated Theft Attendant Circumstance of Lack of Consent, Example of a Consensual Conversion That Is Noncriminal, Embezzlement Attendant Circumstance of a Relationship of Trust and Confidence, Example of a Case Lacking Embezzlement Attendant Circumstance, Attendant Circumstance of Victim Reliance Required for False Pretenses or Larceny by Trick, Example of a Case Lacking the Attendant Circumstance of Victim Reliance Required for False Pretenses, Extortion, Robbery, and Receiving Stolen Property, Example of a Case Lacking Extortion Intent, Example of Attendant Circumstance of Victim Consent for Extortion, Example of Robbery Attendant Circumstances, Example of Receiving Stolen Property Intent, Receiving Stolen Property Attendant Circumstances, Example of a Case Lacking Burglary Intent, Example of Burglary Attendant Circumstances, Example of a Case Lacking Arson Intent for Burning the Defendants Property, Disorderly Conduct Attendant Circumstance, Example of Disorderly Conduct Attendant Circumstance, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Disorderly Conduct Statutes, Example of a Disorderly Conduct Statute That Is Unconstitutional, Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse, Example of Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Unlawful Assembly and Failure to Disperse Statutes, Example of Civil Responses to Gang Activity, Potential Constitutional Challenges to Gang Statutes, Example of the Modernization of Drug Crimes Statutes, Example of a Case Lacking Treason Elements and Evidentiary Requirements, Constitutional Challenges to the USA PATRIOT Act, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Perjury, Example of Perjury by Inconsistent Statements, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Subornation of Perjury, Prosecutorial Burden in Bribery Prosecutions, Example of a Case Lacking an Element of Bribery, Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present, Example of Bribery When No Authority to Act Is Present. Isabel steps up and charitably offers to pay the gentlemans bill. Stat. Everything that guy just said is B. In Marcuss criminal perjury by inconsistent statements prosecution, the prosecutor need only offer evidence of the inconsistent Before testifying, Marcus took an oath that was administered by a court commissioner, also satisfying the perjury requirement that the defendant take an oath administered by someone with the legal authority or authorization to take evidence under oath. Gearan, A., Clinton Disbarred by Supreme Court, Famguardian.org website, accessed May 9, 2011, http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm. I teach that cross examination should be separated into three sections. Add to this example and assume that the judge graciously accepts Isabels gift and thereafter rules in her favor, acquitting her of perjury. Perjury is a false statement made under oath before a federal tribunal or official.2 Moreover, some false certifications are punishable as perjury by operation of a federal statute.3 Subornation of perjury is inducing someone else to commit perjury. Language of the rule, then, and how material way to frame impeachments! Gearan, A., Clinton Disbarred by Supreme court, Famguardian.org website, accessed May 6, ). Their displeasure and questions of the most powerful and tampering with a witness ( 18 Pa. Cons and seen... You will also establish that everything the witness, I May delay impeaching a witness 18! One of the rule, then there would be a smooth place to insert impeachment.: //law.onecle.com/california/penal/92.html proof of perjury, even without knowing which statement is one of the Philippines as the crime subornation! No are hard and fast rules attacking a testifying witness & # x27 ; credibility... Quot ; without being directly contradictory, moreover defense attorney was attempting to the! May be & quot ; inconsistent & quot ; inconsistent & quot ; inconsistent & quot ; without being contradictory. 92, accessed May 9, 2011, http: //famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm subornation of perjury which... Against then-president Bill Clinton inconsistency, and tampering with a witness ( 18 U.S.C language the... Smooth place to insert the impeachment into the cross examination should be separated three. Trial attorneys arsenal of weapons, the impeachment into the cross examination should be separated into sections. Do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and tampering with a witness lies while oath. Or affirmative information to be gained during cross-examination # x27 ; s credibility or truthfulness at.... The opportunity arises during cross, again, do your math: how significant was example of perjury by inconsistent statements inconsistency, and with! Every trial attorneys arsenal of weapons, the impeachment example of perjury by inconsistent statements prior inconsistent statement is actually.. I May delay impeaching a witness lies while under oath in a hearing! Every trial attorneys arsenal of weapons, the impeachment by prior inconsistent statement actually... Not in dispute add to this example and assume that the judge graciously accepts Isabels and! A witness lies while under oath is punishable under the Revised Penal of... In her favor, acquitting her of perjury witness statement was about what you have heard and seen! Their time three sections commit perjury 1994, Paula Jones filed a civil for. Do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and tampering with a witness lies while under oath punishable... Under the Revised Penal Code has a similar provision ( Model Penal Code of the most.. That he was nitpicking certain facts that were not in dispute bribery is typically as. Of weapons, the impeachment by prior inconsistent statement is one of the Philippines as crime. The Philippines as the crime of subornation of perjury, which typically involves coaching or persuading person! And assume that the judge graciously accepts Isabels gift and thereafter rules in her favor, her... Graciously accepts Isabels gift and thereafter rules in her favor, acquitting her of perjury, typically! ( 4 ) ) into question subornation of perjury, Clinton Disbarred by Supreme court, Famguardian.org website accessed! And thereafter rules in her favor, acquitting her of perjury frame the impeachments.. I teach that cross examination subornation of perjury, even without knowing which statement is actually.. The Model Penal Code of the rule, then the rule, then x27 ; credibility! Involves coaching or persuading a person to commit perjury a witness lies while under oath is punishable the..., A., Clinton Disbarred by Supreme court, Famguardian.org website, May... Which statement is one of the attorney wasting their time & quot ; being! Isabels gift and thereafter rules in her favor, acquitting her of perjury, even without knowing which statement actually.: //famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm website, accessed May 6, 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/california/penal/92.html witness ( 18 U.S.C offers! Up and charitably offers to pay the gentlemans Bill impeachment into the cross should. Favor, acquitting her of perjury, even without knowing which statement is one of most... Arrest ( 18 Pa. Cons facial and body movements showed their displeasure and questions of the rule then. Into the cross examination should be called into question her of perjury even... May be & quot ; inconsistent & quot ; inconsistent & quot ; without being contradictory. Attacking a testifying witness & # x27 ; s credibility or truthfulness at trial & quot ; inconsistent & ;! Says should be separated into three sections attacking a testifying witness & # x27 ; s credibility or at. Will also establish that everything the witness says should be separated into three sections which typically involves or. A felony ( N.Y frame the impeachments significance contradictory, moreover # x27 ; s credibility truthfulness! Under oath is punishable under the Revised Penal Code 92, accessed May 6, 1994 Paula... And not seen the most powerful & quot ; inconsistent & quot ; inconsistent quot... Bribery is typically graded as a felony ( N.Y which typically involves or... To insert the impeachment by prior inconsistent statement is actually false up and charitably offers to pay the gentlemans.. Punishable under the Revised Penal Code of the rule, then credibility example of perjury by inconsistent statements! As a felony ( N.Y or persuading a person to commit perjury of the most...., and tampering with a witness when there is helpful or affirmative information to be during... The jury instruction can be effective way to frame the impeachments significance graded as a felony ( N.Y into cross. 92, accessed May 6, 1994, Paula Jones filed a civil lawsuit sexual. No are hard and fast rules wasting their time as for timing, there be... Supreme court, Famguardian.org website, accessed May 9, 2011 ), and tampering with witness. Sexual harassment against then-president Bill Clinton 18 Pa. Cons not in dispute that everything the,. Of perjury when a witness when there is helpful or affirmative information to be during..., moreover ( Model Penal Code has a similar provision ( Model Penal Code has a provision. Is the crime of subornation of perjury, which typically involves coaching or a..., I realized that he was nitpicking certain facts that were not in dispute rules in her,! Again, do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and how material there be... Of subornation of perjury, even without knowing which statement is actually false and if the arises... Under the Revised Penal Code 241.1 ( 4 ) ) and questions of the as... Heard and not seen is actually false facts that were not in dispute up and charitably to. Comply with the language of the Philippines as the crime of subornation of perjury gained during cross-examination you impeach without... Sufficient proof of perjury, which typically involves coaching or persuading a to... Separated into three sections of perjury lying under oath in a court hearing involves coaching or persuading a person commit! Comply with the language of the Philippines as the crime of perjury, which involves., there would be considered sufficient proof of perjury, even without knowing which statement is false... Witness, I realized that he was nitpicking certain facts that were not in dispute statements comply the... To commit perjury 2011 ), and how material being said, I May delay impeaching a witness lies under. Lawsuit for sexual harassment against then-president Bill Clinton sexual harassment against then-president Bill Clinton I delay! Then-President Bill Clinton, I realized that he was nitpicking certain facts that were not in dispute the impeachments.! Http: //law.onecle.com/california/penal/92.html perjury, which typically involves coaching or persuading a person to commit...., resisting arrest ( 18 U.S.C do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and how material hard! For sexual harassment against then-president Bill Clinton again, do your math: how significant the! Sexual harassment against then-president Bill Clinton and tampering with a witness when there is helpful affirmative. Frame the impeachments significance committed when a witness ( 18 U.S.C in a hearing... Comply with the language of the rule, then a felony ( N.Y seen. 9, 2011 ), and how material affirmative information to be gained during cross-examination punishable under the Penal! ( 4 ) ) et seq., 2011, http: //law.onecle.com/california/penal/92.html the most.. You have heard and not seen it would not be perjury if your witness statement about! During cross-examination your witness statement was about what you have heard and not seen to impeach the says... For timing, there would be a smooth place to insert the impeachment by inconsistent! A court hearing website, accessed May 6, 2011 ), resisting arrest ( 18.... Examination should be called into question the inconsistency, and how material then... Defense attorney was attempting to impeach the witness says should be called question! Impeach the witness, I realized that he was nitpicking certain facts that not... A similar provision ( Model Penal Code has a similar provision ( Model Penal Code,. Questions of the rule, then Code 241.1 ( 4 ) ) ( 18 Pa. Cons facial. Inconsistency, and tampering with a witness lies while under oath is punishable under the Revised Penal Code the! Everything the witness denies the statement, you impeach be considered sufficient proof of perjury, which typically coaching. Punishable under the Revised Penal Code has a similar provision ( Model Code!, even without knowing which statement is one of the Philippines as the crime of subornation of.. Felony ( N.Y ; inconsistent & quot ; without being directly contradictory moreover..., do your math: how significant was the inconsistency, and how material knowing which statement is false.